[HTML][HTML] PPARG binding landscapes in macrophages suggest a genome-wide contribution of PU. 1 to divergent PPARG binding in human and mouse

S Pott, NK Kamrani, G Bourque, S Pettersson, ET Liu - PLoS One, 2012 - journals.plos.org
PLoS One, 2012journals.plos.org
Background Genome-wide comparisons of transcription factor binding sites in different
species can be used to evaluate evolutionary constraints that shape gene regulatory circuits
and to understand how the interaction between transcription factors shapes their binding
landscapes over evolution. Results We have compared the PPARG binding landscapes in
macrophages to investigate the evolutionary impact on PPARG binding diversity in mouse
and humans for this important nuclear receptor. Of note, only 5% of the PPARG binding sites …
Background
Genome-wide comparisons of transcription factor binding sites in different species can be used to evaluate evolutionary constraints that shape gene regulatory circuits and to understand how the interaction between transcription factors shapes their binding landscapes over evolution.
Results
We have compared the PPARG binding landscapes in macrophages to investigate the evolutionary impact on PPARG binding diversity in mouse and humans for this important nuclear receptor. Of note, only 5% of the PPARG binding sites were shared between the two species. In contrast, at the gene level, PPARG target genes conserved between both species constitute more than 30% of the target genes regulated by PPARG ligand in human macrophages. Moreover, the majority of all PPARG binding sites (55–60%) in macrophages show co-occupancy of the lineage-specification factor PU.1 in both species. Exploring the evolutionary dynamics of PPARG binding sites, we observed that PU.1 co-binding to PPARG sites appears to be important for possible PPARG ancestral functions such as lipid metabolism. Thus we speculate that PU.1 may have guided utilization of these species-specific PPARG conserved binding sites in macrophages during evolution.
Conclusions
We propose a model in which PU.1 sites may have served as “anchor” loci for the formation of new and functionally relevant PPARG binding sites throughout evolution. As PU.1 is an essential factor in macrophage biology, such an evolutionary mechanism would allow for the establishment of relevant PPARG regulatory modules in a PU.1-dependent manner and yet permit for nuanced regulatory changes in individual species.
PLOS