Combination of the insulin sensitizer, pioglitazone, and the long‐acting GLP‐1 human analog, liraglutide, exerts potent synergistic glucose‐lowering efficacy in …
PJ Larsen, EM Wulff, CF Gotfredsen… - Diabetes, Obesity …, 2008 - Wiley Online Library
PJ Larsen, EM Wulff, CF Gotfredsen, CL Brand, J Sturis, N Vrang, LB Knudsen…
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2008•Wiley Online LibraryObjective: Severe insulin resistance and impaired pancreatic β‐cell function are
pathophysiological contributors to type 2 diabetes, and ideally, antihyperglycaemic
strategies should address both. Research Design and Methods: Therapeutic benefits of
combining the long‐acting human glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analog, liraglutide (0.4
mg/kg/day), with insulin sensitizer, pioglitazone (10 mg/kg/day), were assessed in severely
diabetic Zucker diabetic fatty rats for 42 days. Impact on glycaemic control was assessed by …
pathophysiological contributors to type 2 diabetes, and ideally, antihyperglycaemic
strategies should address both. Research Design and Methods: Therapeutic benefits of
combining the long‐acting human glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analog, liraglutide (0.4
mg/kg/day), with insulin sensitizer, pioglitazone (10 mg/kg/day), were assessed in severely
diabetic Zucker diabetic fatty rats for 42 days. Impact on glycaemic control was assessed by …
Objective: Severe insulin resistance and impaired pancreatic β‐cell function are pathophysiological contributors to type 2 diabetes, and ideally, antihyperglycaemic strategies should address both.
Research Design and Methods: Therapeutic benefits of combining the long‐acting human glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analog, liraglutide (0.4 mg/kg/day), with insulin sensitizer, pioglitazone (10 mg/kg/day), were assessed in severely diabetic Zucker diabetic fatty rats for 42 days. Impact on glycaemic control was assessed by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) at day 28 and by oral glucose tolerance test at day 42.
Results: Liraglutide and pioglitazone synergistically improved glycaemic control as reflected by a marked decrease in HbA1C (liraglutide + pioglitazone: 4.8 ± 0.3%; liraglutide: 8.8 ± 0.6%; pioglitazone: 7.9 ± 0.4%; vehicle: 9.7 ± 0.3%) and improved oral glucose tolerance at day 42 (area under the curve; liraglutide + pioglitazone: 4244 ± 445 mmol/l × min; liraglutide: 7164 ± 187 mmol/l × min; pioglitazone: 7430 ± 446 mmol/l × min; vehicle: 8093 ± 139 mmol/l × min). A 24‐h plasma glucose profile at day 38 was significantly decreased only in the liraglutide + pioglitazone group. In addition, 24‐h insulin profile was significantly elevated only in the liraglutide + pioglitazone group. Liraglutide significantly decreased food intake alone and in combination with pioglitazone, while pioglitazone alone increased cumulated food intake. As a result, rats on liraglutide alone gained significantly less weight than vehicle‐treated rats, whereas rats on pioglitazone alone gained significantly more body weight than vehicle‐treated rats. However, combination therapy with liraglutide and pioglitazone caused the largest weight gain, probably reflecting marked improvement of energy balance because of reduction of glucosuria.
Conclusions: Combination therapy with insulinotropic GLP‐1 agonist liraglutide and insulin sensitizer, pioglitazone, improves glycaemic control above and beyond what would be expected from additive effects of the two antidiabetic agents.
Wiley Online Library