The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Design and methods of a national observational disease registry

EA Knapp, AK Fink, CH Goss, A Sewall… - Annals of the …, 2016 - atsjournals.org
EA Knapp, AK Fink, CH Goss, A Sewall, J Ostrenga, C Dowd, A Elbert, KM Petren…
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016atsjournals.org
Rationale: The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) is an ongoing patient
registry study that collects longitudinal demographic, clinical, and treatment information
about persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) in the United States. CF is a life-shortening genetic
disorder that occurs in approximately 1 in 3,500 births in the United States. High-quality
observational data is important for clinical research, quality improvement, and clinical
management. Objectives: To describe the data collection, patient population, and key …
Rationale: The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) is an ongoing patient registry study that collects longitudinal demographic, clinical, and treatment information about persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) in the United States. CF is a life-shortening genetic disorder that occurs in approximately 1 in 3,500 births in the United States. High-quality observational data is important for clinical research, quality improvement, and clinical management.
Objectives: To describe the data collection, patient population, and key limitations of the CFFPR.
Methods: Inclusion criteria for the CFFPR include diagnosis with CF or a CFTR-associated disorder, care at an accredited care center program, and provision of informed consent. Data from clinic visits and hospitalizations are collected through a secure website. Loss to follow-up and generalizability were examined using several methods. The accuracy of CFFPR data was evaluated with an audit of 2012 CFFPR data compared to the medical record.
Measurements and Main Results: Since 1986, the CFFPR contains the records of 48,463 individuals with CF. Participation among individuals seen at accredited care centers is high, and loss to follow-up is low. An audit of 2012 CFFPR data suggests that the CFFPR contains 95% of clinic visits and 90% of hospitalizations found in the medical record for these patients, and nearly all of the audited fields were highly accurate.
Conclusions: Registries such as the CFFPR are important tools for research, clinical care, and tracking incidence, mortality and population trends.
ATS Journals